"The One Big Beautiful Bill": A Looming Threat to American Democracy?
Washington, D.C., July 23, 2025 – On July 4, President Donald Trump signed into law his much-touted "One Big Beautiful Bill." While Trump praises it, critics argue the bill is designed to enrich the wealthy, punish the poor, and propel American plutocracy to new, dangerous heights. The bill's core component—a massive allocation of funds to anti-immigration efforts—is raising serious questions about the future of American democracy and human rights.
Unprecedented Immigration Funding: Empowering ICE
A highly contentious aspect of the Trump administration's bill is the unprecedented $175 billion allocated to anti-immigration initiatives. A significant portion, approximately $30 billion, will go directly to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), drastically expanding its power and operations. An additional $45 billion is earmarked for the construction of new immigration detention centers, representing a staggering 265% annual budget increase to ICE's current detention budget, according to the American Immigration Council. This immense funding positions ICE as the largest federal law enforcement agency in U.S. history, boasting an annual budget larger than the military of any country except the U.S. and China.
Controversial Practices and Abuses of Power
Recent allegations of ICE agents, often masked, engaging in kidnappings, have fueled concerns about the agency's ethics and effectiveness. While the Trump administration asserts this funding will protect the nation from "vicious criminal illegal aliens," critics counter that the vast majority of individuals detained by ICE have no criminal record whatsoever.
Victims include a six-year-old Honduran boy with leukemia, arrested during an asylum hearing, and a 57-year-old Mexican farmworker who died after falling from a greenhouse roof during an ICE raid that led to over 360 arrests. Even documented individuals, like George Retes, a 25-year-old U.S. Army veteran, have been subjected to pepper spray and three-day detentions without explanation. These incidents suggest that ICE's focus extends beyond undocumented immigrants, engaging in indiscriminate arrests to meet detention quotas.
Political Repression and Criminalization of Dissent
Beyond arbitrary detentions, there are growing accusations that ICE is being weaponized for political repression and the criminalization of dissent. The recent abductions of international scholars opposing the U.S.-backed Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip serve as stark examples. Rumeysa Ozturk, a 30-year-old Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University, was surrounded by masked agents and taken to an ICE detention center in Louisiana simply for co-authoring an article expressing solidarity with Palestinians. Her harrowing 45-day detention, marked by deplorable conditions, underscores the erosion of civil liberties for those who dare to voice dissent.
Is America Becoming a "Police State"?
When Minnesota Governor Tim Walz controversially referred to ICE as "Trump's modern-day Gestapo," the U.S. Department of Homeland Security retorted, deeming his comments "dangerous rhetoric." However, critics argue that the actions of an agency kidnapping doctoral students, child leukemia patients, and army veterans constitute a more genuine form of "dangerous rhetoric."
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, aptly observes, "you don’t build the mass deportation machine without building the police state first." Considering the Cambridge Dictionary's definition of a 'police state'—"a country in which the government uses the police to severely limit people’s freedom"—the "One Big Beautiful Bill" and the unchecked expansion of ICE's power suggest the U.S. is alarmingly close to fitting this description. When a rogue agency snatches individuals off the streets and entire communities live in fear, it fundamentally undermines the notion of a "land of the free," particularly when the President appears to deem anyone disagreeing with him as potentially subject to criminal punishment.
What implications do you think this expanded power of ICE, fueled by the "One Big Beautiful Bill," will have on the future of civil liberties in the United States?